Why photo documentation is your best defence in a cargo claim

In this article we cover the importance of photo documentation in the event of cargo claims.

In logistics, cargo claims are almost inevitable. Goods arrive damaged, delayed, or short, and the consignee (buyer) or shipper (seller) files a cargo damage claim against the carrier, freight forwarder, or warehouse operator. Under international conventions such as CMR (road) and Hague-Visby (sea), the law presumes the carrier is liable unless they can prove otherwise.

That burden of proof makes claims expensive for logistics providers. Even when damage is caused by poor packaging, rough handling upstream, or inherent defects in the goods, logistics companies often lose money simply because they lack the right evidence. Without a clear record, they end up paying unjustified claims, facing higher insurance premiums, or absorbing chargebacks from customers.

This is why photo documentation (fotodokumentation in German) is such a powerful defence. Structured, time-stamped images taken at the right moments – goods inspection, loading supervision, and delivery handover – can shift liability away from the logistics provider and to the party responsible. But photo documentation alone isn’t enough. To be effective, it must be well-organized and easily retrievable. Scattered images across WhatsApp, email threads, or relying on “your word against theirs” can lead to lengthy disputes. A professional evidence pack, however, clearly shows what happened and protects the logistics provider.

For warehouses and logistics centres, photo documentation is not only about efficiency. It is about protecting margins and reputation in an industry where claims can eat directly into profitability. Tools like Blimp App make this protection practical on the warehouse floor by ensuring every photo is automatically tied to a shipment and ready to support a freight claim process at a moment’s notice.

Why photos are decisive in cargo claims

Cargo claims typically hinge on three questions:

  1. Condition at handover – Did the goods and packaging appear sound when the carrier took custody?
    • By law, if no reservations are made upon receipt, carriers are presumed to have received the goods in good order. Photos taken during goods inspection can rebut that presumption if defects existed at collection.
  2. Care during transport – Did the carrier handle and stow the goods properly?
    • Carriers must show they fulfilled their duties. Photos of load securing, pallets, and seals demonstrate diligence.
  3. Packaging responsibility – Was the damage due to inadequate packaging?
    • The sender (shipper) is responsible for providing packaging suitable for transport. In the absence of photographic evidence, logistics providers often assume liability for damage that should properly rest with the shipper.

In all three areas, strong photo documentation strengthens the defence of the logistics provider.

The cost of weak or missing evidence

When photos are missing or cannot be retrieved easily because of poor organisation, logistics providers face three common risks:

  • Paying claims they could have defended: Without photos of defective packaging or properly stowed cargo, carriers have little choice but to accept liability.
  • Higher insurance premiums: Frequent payouts due to weak defence records lead insurers to raise premiums.
  • Commercial pressure from customers: Shippers or consignees may push back on invoices or apply chargebacks if disputes cannot be quickly resolved.

Too often, logistics managers spend late evenings hunting through emails and WhatsApp threads for the right image to defend a claim – only to find that, by the time it’s located, the claim has already been decided against the company.

Where photo documentation makes the biggest difference

1. Outbound goods inspection

Photos of: Pallets, packaging, strapping, and labels with barcodes visible

  • These establish whether packaging was fit or unfit for transport
  • Provide evidence to defend against claims later blamed on the logistics provider but actually caused by inadequate packaging.

2. Loading supervision

Images of blocking, bracing, seal application, and container stowage

  • Demonstrates compliance with carrier duties under Hague-Visby
  • Provides evidence to defend provider against claims alleging mishandling during transit

3. Delivery and proof of condition

Photos of: Seal numbers, delivery receipts, and condition upon arrival

  • Critical when claimants allege the goods were damaged upon receipt
  • Helps resolve freight loss and damage claims quickly

4. Concealed damage

Photos of: Immediate photos of packaging and goods the moment damage is discovered after delivery– Confirms that damage was not visible at handover– Provides the logistics provider with evidence to defend against concealed damage freight claims where liability is contested

Learn how Blimp's Photo Documentation App helps you save time

Sign up for Blimp App to get started for free.

Learn more

Packaging responsibility: Why photos shift liability

A recurring dispute in cargo claims in shipping is whether the packaging was adequate.

  • CMR (road, Article 10): The sender is liable for damage caused by defective packing, unless the defect was apparent and the carrier failed to note it. Photos taken at collection protect carriers by showing whether defects were visible.
  • Hague-Visby (sea): Carriers must load and stow properly, but cannot be held liable for defects in packaging that were not apparent. Again, photos are decisive.
  • Forwarder contracts: Many freight forwarder liability regimes (such as FIATA Model Rules) emphasise due diligence. Documented photos help forwarders demonstrate they acted with care.

In practice, without photos, packaging disputes default against the carrier or forwarder. With   photos, liability can be shifted back to the shipper.

Turning photos into defensible reports

Taking photos is not the hard part – warehouses already do this. The challenge is traceability. This means:

  • Linking photos to shipment identifiers (AWB, BOL, consignment note)
  • Ensuring timestamps and user attribution
  • Keeping evidence centralised rather than spread across personal phones, WhatsApp or email chains
  • Generating a professional cargo damage report quickly

When these elements are missing, logistics companies weaken their defence and risk paying claims unnecessarily.

How Blimp App strengthens your defence

Blimp App addresses these exact pain points:

  • Scan-to-tag: Every photo is tied to a shipment through barcode or QR code scanning, eliminating ambiguity.
  • Shared device, PIN login: Floor staff can log into a shared phone in seconds, capture their session, and log out again – ensuring accountability without relying on personal devices.
  • Cloud storage and reporting: Photos are automatically organised and can be exported as a clean cargo damage report with timestamps and user IDs, ready for insurers or claims handlers.

Instead of trawling through email and WhatsApp later, managers have defensible reports in minutes – often enough to reverse or avoid liability.

Why this matters to logistics providers

  • Protecting margins: Strong evidence prevents unjustified payouts.
  • Reducing premiums: Insurers reward companies that can consistently defend claims with higher quality evidence.
  • Customer trust: Quick, professional evidence packs reassure customers that issues are handled transparently and fairly.

In short, systematic photo documentation is not just an operational tool – it is a financial safeguard.

Bottom line

Cargo claims are a cost of doing business in logistics, but they do not need to be a cost borne unfairly. The law presumes carriers and forwarders are liable, and without evidence, that presumption is hard to overturn.

Systematic photo documentation flips the equation. It allows logistics providers to prove where responsibility lies, protect margins, and resolve disputes more quickly. In a business where profit margins are thin, the difference between weak and strong photo evidence can be the difference between a claim you pay and a claim you successfully defend.

Tools like Blimp App make it possible to capture, organise, and present that evidence without adding extra work to the warehouse floor – helping logistics companies protect themselves where it matters most.

© 2025 Blimp App. All Rights Reserved. Logos are trademarks of their respective owners. To safeguard the privacy of our testimonials, we use generic names and images.